| Robert E. Lee | |
|
+5The Opposition General Stuart Iron Brigade General DCCCfC aka General Lee Civility_C 9 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
General Stuart Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1465 Age : 34 Localisation : central California Registration date : 2006-10-23
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:40 pm | |
| I thought they all were rotted out by the time you were 5? | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:41 pm | |
| Actually thats not far from the truth lol. All my baby teeth practically had to be pulled. | |
|
| |
General Stuart Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1465 Age : 34 Localisation : central California Registration date : 2006-10-23
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:43 pm | |
| ummmmmm, to get back to the topic........ | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:45 pm | |
| ............. | |
|
| |
General Stuart Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1465 Age : 34 Localisation : central California Registration date : 2006-10-23
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:46 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:47 pm | |
| Stuart. | |
|
| |
The One And Only Artillary
Number of posts : 28 Localisation : California Registration date : 2006-11-28
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:50 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:51 pm | |
| Awwwwwwww that's mean, why you gotta gang up on me for lol. And after I welcomed you to the forum and all.............................. | |
|
| |
The One And Only Artillary
Number of posts : 28 Localisation : California Registration date : 2006-11-28
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:10 pm | |
| you were the one ganging up on stuart when he was gone. | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| |
| |
Iron Brigade General President
Number of posts : 1811 Age : 35 Localisation : Playing robber with the nerdy cops Registration date : 2006-10-03
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 am | |
| You curropted the newbie! Don't you people have any shame? lol. | |
|
| |
coby Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1542 Age : 34 Localisation : Nebraska Registration date : 2006-10-18
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:18 am | |
| of course not, what gave you that idea? | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| |
| |
DCCCfC aka General Lee Cavalry Trooper
Number of posts : 356 Age : 97 Localisation : The Island of Christian Theocracy Registration date : 2006-10-10
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:28 pm | |
| If you Yanks dont get back on topic then I will consider the conversation closed and the South the winner... | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:47 pm | |
| Get some new material once in a while, seriously Lee now come on. | |
|
| |
Iron Brigade General President
Number of posts : 1811 Age : 35 Localisation : Playing robber with the nerdy cops Registration date : 2006-10-03
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:24 am | |
| SOuth won, south won, south won. Are you going to say anything else. And, really, you guys only look at the fact that Lee surrendered because he had less men. He could have escaped. Thier was a gap in the union line big enough for the army to leave through. Longstreet told Lee this. Lee refused to do it. So, it's partly his own fault that he surrendered when he did. | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:35 am | |
| - Iron Brigade General wrote:
- SOuth won, south won, south won. Are you going to say anything else. And, really, you guys only look at the fact that Lee surrendered because he had less men. He could have escaped. Thier was a gap in the union line big enough for the army to leave through. Longstreet told Lee this. Lee refused to do it. So, it's partly his own fault that he surrendered when he did.
WEll duh but some people refuse to believe that Lee surrendered because he wanted to not because he had no choice. | |
|
| |
Iron Brigade General President
Number of posts : 1811 Age : 35 Localisation : Playing robber with the nerdy cops Registration date : 2006-10-03
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:34 am | |
| Like I said before, no one wants to take the blame. Especially legends. | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:44 pm | |
| Aint it da tooth. | |
|
| |
coby Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1542 Age : 34 Localisation : Nebraska Registration date : 2006-10-18
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:18 pm | |
| would they be legends if they did take the blame? | |
|
| |
Iron Brigade General President
Number of posts : 1811 Age : 35 Localisation : Playing robber with the nerdy cops Registration date : 2006-10-03
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:23 pm | |
| Lee did take blame. He gave his own blame and got blamed at the beginning of the war. | |
|
| |
Civility_C General-in-Chief
Number of posts : 1300 Age : 32 Registration date : 2006-10-05
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:12 pm | |
| ROBERT E. LEE IS COOL! Sorry. Just thought I'd trow that in there lol | |
|
| |
General Stuart Iron Brigade
Number of posts : 1465 Age : 34 Localisation : central California Registration date : 2006-10-23
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:46 pm | |
| IBG, I'm surprised at you, you're trying to find fault with Lee, otherwise you would remember that Lee only chose to surrender to save the needless deaths that a prolonging of the war would bring, and because he felt that "All has been lost, save honor." You would also call him an old fanatic if he fought to the death. Lee always did the noble deed, the honorable thing, and it usually was the best thing in the end. | |
|
| |
Iron Brigade General President
Number of posts : 1811 Age : 35 Localisation : Playing robber with the nerdy cops Registration date : 2006-10-03
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:17 pm | |
| And, yet, you can't accept the fact that Sherman's March to the Sea shortened the war..... And, no. I'm not trying to find fault with the old man. I am just showing you guys that everyone has faults. Even the greats had faults. | |
|
| |
The Opposition Army Commander
Number of posts : 1917 Age : 109 Localisation : ............. Registration date : 2006-10-26
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:45 pm | |
| Well said IBG. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Robert E. Lee | |
| |
|
| |
| Robert E. Lee | |
|